Not Logged In Log In   Sign Up   Points Leaders
Follow Us    10:22 PM

Message Forum - Read Message

Category: All Things Ethanol > Topics Add to favorite topics   Post new topicPost New Topic
Author Topic: Energy Beets: Who will Leap First? Post a Reply Back to Topics
goldseeker

Champion Author
West Virginia

Posts:19,573
Points:2,721,740
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Apr 21, 2012 12:22:43 AM

North Dakota-based Green Vision Group is resolutely moving forward with a plan to build multiple 20 MMgy dedicated energy beet plants in the state. The quest began in 2007 and took some big leaps in early 2012, when it received $1 million in funding from the North Dakota Renewable Energy Council and other sources, says Maynard Helgaas, president. Around the same time, North Dakota State University, which has been assisting with the project, submitted an energy beet ethanol life-cycle analysis to the U.S. EPA in an effort to get it qualified as an advanced biofuel. The group has its first location selected, although it hasn’t been announced yet, and hopes to begin processing ethanol by fall 2014.

With up to 1,000 gallons of ethanol production in just one acre of land. In other words, energy beets have the power to produce about double the amount of ethanol in one acre, when compared to corn.

Besides ethanol, energy beet ethanol plants produce other valuable coproducts, including animal feed from the leftover beet pulp, much like distillers grains.

I am all for alternative feedstocks. I have always believed that a diversity of feedstocks is the best way to go. This would also be a great opportunity for some of the small shuttered ethanol plants.
REPLIES (newest first)
Profile Pic
elcid1300
Champion Author San Diego

Posts:1,663
Points:314,975
Joined:Jul 2012
Message Posted: Jul 13, 2012 10:02:28 AM

this story has been beet to death.
Profile Pic
oilpan4
Champion Author Virginia

Posts:12,062
Points:306,900
Joined:Jul 2006
Message Posted: Jul 12, 2012 8:34:40 AM

" I believe the reason ethanol has not been made on a commercial scale from sugar beets instead of corn is because it is too expensive".

If I remember correctly sugar beets need a lot of nitrogen fertilizer to grow them properly. So they are not cheap to grow.
Profile Pic
chemist74
Champion Author Cleveland

Posts:13,510
Points:2,395,980
Joined:Apr 2005
Message Posted: Jul 12, 2012 7:14:37 AM

Technicaqlly, ethanol can be made from any plant that produces sugars or starches. Cellulosic ethanol technology would increase the potential crop sources. I believe the reason ethanol has not been made on a commercial scale from sugar beets instead of corn is because it is too expensive.

If they have found a way to make ethanol from sugar beets cheap enough without government subsides, great.
Profile Pic
SilverStreaker
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:11,952
Points:2,219,425
Joined:Mar 2006
Message Posted: Jul 11, 2012 1:40:22 PM

Sweet Sorghum is another ethanol producting crop.
Profile Pic
the1roadhog
Champion Author Atlanta

Posts:9,913
Points:2,058,530
Joined:Jun 2007
Message Posted: May 12, 2012 7:02:26 AM

Team this up with algea and there you go PrezO.
Profile Pic
goldseeker
Champion Author West Virginia

Posts:19,573
Points:2,721,740
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: May 12, 2012 5:48:01 AM

Green energy plan would turn sugar beets into biofuels

The vacant Spreckels sugar beet factory in Mendota may receive a green energy overhaul, as a group of former sugar beet farmers pursues a plan to transform the site into an advanced biorefinery using several high-tech processes to convert sugar beets into ethanol and other forms of energy.The energy beet refinery facility would incorporate:
n Advanced ethanol production:

About 150 truckloads of harvested beets a day would be processed into advanced, second-level ethanol. During the process, some cellulosic ethanol would also be produced. Beets produce about 1,200 gallons per acre of ethanol, compared to 450 to 500 gallons per acre of corn. On an annual basis, 1.4 million tons of beets would be needed, which represents the production from about 35,000 acres.

n Biomass gasifier: Biomass prunings would go into the biomass gasifier and into a steam turbine, which would make both steam and electricity. The processed steam would be recycled for ethanol production and the electricity would be used internally. The process would produce almost 40 percent of its own electricity.n Water treatment facility: Wastewater from the beets and from the city of Mendota would be processed through the water treatment facility and converted into processed water. About 400 acre-feet of surplus water for agriculture and landscaping would be produced each year.It will be interesting to see where this plan goes.

Bring it on!



[Edited by: goldseeker at 5/12/2012 6:51:00 AM EST]
Profile Pic
goldseeker
Champion Author West Virginia

Posts:19,573
Points:2,721,740
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Apr 28, 2012 11:04:03 PM

Fodder Beets may be an even better choice.
Profile Pic
mr157ifhz
Sophomore Author Gasbuddy

Posts:155
Points:3,120
Joined:Mar 2012
Message Posted: Apr 21, 2012 12:17:18 PM

Another great crop to use is sweet sorghum. It can be grown wherever corn can grow -including northern areas- needs half the water and a fraction of the fertilizer.
-Matt

[Edited by: mr157ifhz at 4/21/2012 1:20:02 PM EST]
Profile Pic
SilverStreaker
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:11,952
Points:2,219,425
Joined:Mar 2006
Message Posted: Apr 21, 2012 11:39:54 AM

I always wondered why they don't use beets for ethanol, since they use beets to make sugar.
Profile Pic
chemist74
Champion Author Cleveland

Posts:13,510
Points:2,395,980
Joined:Apr 2005
Message Posted: Apr 21, 2012 8:10:46 AM

Most people do not realize that most of the sugar produced in the United States already comes from sugar beets grown in northern states, not sugar cane (which can not be grown in most states).
Profile Pic
goldseeker
Champion Author West Virginia

Posts:19,573
Points:2,721,740
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Apr 21, 2012 7:11:14 AM

ProfDude: Yes, there are plenty of crop options. However you have to remember there is also a "catch 22". You have to have sufficient quantities to produce the end product, and you also have to have a market for the end product, or the product will fail.

Folks like to claim that sugar cane is the real crop for ethanol, but when you do a little research you find that you cannot grow sugar cane in quantity anywhere. Oh, we can grow it in the southern tier states and Hawaii, but that is about it. However, sweet sorghum can be grown in most of the lower 48 states, and it has a shorter growing season. In the southern regions two crops can be grown in one year. Some strains can yield over 1000 gallons of ethanol per acre. Sounds promising doesn't it. However, we must remember, there is no infrastructure in place for sorghum ethanol. Once you harvest sorghum you must crush the stalk to extract the juice in a short period of time. If you do not, then you will lose the sugar content. With corn you can store it for months, even years. Not the case with sorghum and sugar cane.

Inspite of these limitations, I do believe that it should be researched and developed. We should never place our eggs in one basket. A diversified approach is the best solution.
Profile Pic
ProfDude
Champion Author Illinois

Posts:2,213
Points:450,470
Joined:Jan 2012
Message Posted: Apr 21, 2012 1:38:38 AM

I have often thought that it would be good to try something other than corn for this purpose.

I had presumed that such an alternative crop would need to be grown farther south. Apparently there are more fuel crop options available to us yet.
Post a reply Back to Topics